More than 4 million . The cybersecurity leak鈥攚hich the company says is now patched鈥攊ncluded thousands of documents detailing emergency plans at U.S. schools, including lockdown procedures.
The data leak is the latest in a series of high-profile cybersecurity incidents with K-12 vendors from the past few years, including a 2022 cyberattack on Illuminate Education, and a .
But incidents like this raise the question: what can districts do when a vendor they trust to hold sensitive data fails to safeguard that information? It鈥檚 not a question reserved just for the districts affected by the Raptor Technologies data security leak, said Doug Levin, the director of K12 Security Information Exchange, which tracks cybersecurity problems in schools.
鈥淚n general, security experts would encourage school systems to outsource these services to technology companies that may be more expert at protecting IT systems than school districts, because it is their full-time job and may have more expertise,鈥� he said. 鈥淗owever, it does mean that if they happen to be compromised, the scope of those incidents can be orders of magnitude larger.鈥�
In a statement to 澳门跑狗论坛, Raptor Technologies Chief Marketing Officer David Rogers said the company is taking extra precautions in addressing the leak. 鈥淲e take this matter incredibly seriously and will remain vigilant, including by monitoring the web for any evidence that any data that has been in our possession is being misused,鈥� he said.
While there鈥檚 only so much schools can do to protect data that has been shared with vendors, say experts, there are steps schools should take to do their due diligence and be savvy customers.
Students鈥� medical records, school safety evacuation plans, names of students who might pose threats were compromised
In December, a security researcher working for a company called vpnMentor reported the data leak to Raptor Technologies, which is used by more than 5,300 U.S. school districts, according to the company鈥檚 website. That represents more than a third of all school districts in the country. Earlier this month, the security incident was , which found a host of sensitive information was left exposed, including:
- Evacuation plans with maps showing escape routes and meeting places;
- Information on students who had been flagged as posing a threat on campus;
- Court documents outlining family abuse and restraining orders;
- Medical records, including students鈥� health conditions;
- The names and ID numbers of staff, parents, guardians, and students;
- And, in some cases, details such as whether a door was locked or a security camera was broken.
鈥淭he sensitivity of these data are definitely a concern,鈥� said Levin. 鈥淭his is not a case where simply offering free credit monitoring is necessarily the right remedy, even though that is the standard for companies that experience an incident.鈥�
Raptor Technologies provides a suite of software services to school districts, including products that screen and track school visitors, monitor student attendance, and conduct behavioral threat and suicide risk assessments.
The District of Columbia Public Schools was among the districts affected鈥攁lthough only to a relatively small degree, the district said in a notice to families. The district had only recently started using Raptor Technologies鈥� visitor management software in some of its schools, so student names and ID numbers were temporarily accessible. The district has suspended the use of the software.
鈥淥ur investigation into the nature of the issue remains ongoing,鈥� Rogers said in the statement from Raptor Technologies. 鈥淗owever, at this time, Raptor is supporting its customers, if needed, in reviewing the contents of the data and ensuring that any individuals whose personal information could have been affected are appropriately notified.鈥�
Raptor Technologies also emphasized in its statement that its security protocols are 鈥渞igorously tested鈥� by third-party reviewers.
What schools can鈥攁nd can鈥檛鈥攄o to protect themselves
It鈥檚 a dilemma for schools. On the one hand, schools need these vendors. Having the infrastructure and expertise to collect, manage, and protect student data is becoming increasingly out of reach for districts as both technology and cybercriminals become more sophisticated.
On the other hand, once that data leaves a school system鈥檚 orbit, there鈥檚 little it can do to safeguard it.
Where districts have the most power to protect school data is before they sign on the dotted line of a contract, said Amy McLaughlin, the cybersecurity initiative project director for the Consortium for School Networking, a professional association for K-12 education technology leaders. Districts should carefully read vendor contracts and conduct a risk assessment of the vendor, she said. CoSN offers a .
It鈥檚 also important to have realistic expectations.
鈥淵ou鈥檙e not going to have a risk-free environment,鈥� McLaughlin said. 鈥淛ust because somebody has had a security incident doesn鈥檛 mean that you shouldn鈥檛 use them. You want to know how they responded to it.鈥�
A best practice is for a vendor to quickly acknowledge that it has identified a problem, said McLaughlin, and disclose how long it took them to lock down the system. Vendors should also commit to continuing to monitor the problem and detail what they learned from the incident and what additional steps they have put in place to ensure it doesn鈥檛 happen again.
Levin further emphasizes that efforts to improve cybersecurity in K-12 education should focus on the vendors as much as the school districts they contract with. Too often, he said, the focus has been on districts when there鈥檚 a limited amount they can do.
鈥淲hat do we need to do around procurement so we can better assess an IT vendor鈥檚 security claims?鈥� he said. 鈥淚f we鈥檙e introducing risks by using these products, what is the good housekeeping seal that districts can look to, to know that vendors are taking this seriously?鈥�
There is the that vendors can sign, but it is a voluntary commitment, not a binding one.
Regulators are also key. Several federal agencies have been focusing more on the cybersecurity practices of online companies, including those that serve K-12 education, said Levin.
鈥淒ata and information about school systems is only as secure as the weakest link,鈥� he said.
